Do I need glasses?

1 10 2008


virtual glasses

virtual glasses

I went to the opticians (specsavers) last week for an eye check. They diagnosed me with +1 long sight in both eyes, with a slight Cylindrical and Axis distortion in the left over the right. The optician said that I would benefit from glasses, especially while watching TV and using the computer.


I was quite chuffed, strangely you may think. Perhaps many people don’t want glasses, but I was looking forward to getting some.


Today I booked myself in to the local independant opticians for again, an eye test. This time, the prescription was +.5 and +.25 (L and R), over half what the Specsavers optician had said.

Why would this be different?

A couple of ideas popped into my head. 

1) Specsavers are a mass market glasses retailer who will sell anyone glasses.

2) Bearing in mind the test was only a tenner, the optician at Specsavers was perhaps on a low rate of pay and was working in a dimly lit smelly basement, never good for the moral and interest.

3) The local independent optician given that he has set up his own ‘surgery’ has a greater self interest in serving the needs of his clients and probably a greater respect and keenness on his chosen profession.

I worked in a photography company which was run who I imagine Specsavers to be. Charge’m nothing, pack’em in, make the money on volume of sales (debateably at the expense of quality and care taken).

Compare that to working for an independant photographer who has been doing his own thing for 20 years and you begin to see why I went for a second opinion.


I found the independent optician to be more interested, happy, keen and knowledgeable (thus confirming my suspicions). But taking that out of the equation and assuming each were equally as competent. Why so different on 2 different days?

I can put this down to a few factors..

Specsavers used a projector to display the sight charts (similar in experience to your computer LCD screen), Mr Independent used a traditional ‘sight box’ (flat translucent screen with a light behind).  I found the projected image more difficult to read than the light box and the specsavers optician took readings in complete darkness whereas the independent’s room was well light with natural light.

The second factor may have been that over the last few days I have been taking copious amounts of vitamin C for a cold I currently have. This does tend to make my eyes feel better and it was confirmed by the optician today that VitC is good for the eyes.

My vision certainly felt sharper today compared to last week, but still who was right, glasses or not glasses?


I figure that in the worst case scenario (ie with the lights out watching tv or the computer lcd screen) glasses would help. But in a normal scenario I don’t need them. Most of the time I will be in a ‘normal’ scenario, so why bother.


I am still looking forward (no pun intended) to getting glasses if the true need ever arises.



5 responses

4 08 2009

I’ve been going to specsaverrs for the last 17 years or so and I’ve been wearing daily lenses for 10 years which means I have an eye test every 2 years and a contact lens test every year under the conditions of my contact lens scheme.

I’ve always had a problem seeing dark on light and projectors have always magnified that problem so when they introduced the projectors I told them I wouldnt be able to see it properly and do they have a standard ‘light box’ I could be tested on.. Never the less they tested my eyes on the projector and low and behold my perscription had gone through the roof, now I had not noticed any probelms with my sight since my last test but they started panicing me by telling me my eye sight had dropped significantly and I should worry about that..

Anyhoo I havent been back for over two years and now they are starting to threaten me with cancelling my contact lens scheme.

4 08 2009

We can’t be the only people to have this, there must be so many people scared into buying incorrect prescriptions. Scandalous really, opticians must be aware of this problem, surely?!

12 12 2009

Hi I had a very entertaining lunch date with a trip to Specsavers New Street Birmingham UK. After a not so good eye test it was decided that I needed reading glasses which were purchased at a decent price. After a couple of days I noticed that the new glasses were no different than my old ones.
Revisiting the store to ask for a refund as having been sold something that was unnecessary, the shop assistant was adamant that the glasses were fine but when I asked why my laptop was distorted she said I needed another pair or varifocals?
So Ok for the varifocals but why was I then told to wear my old reading glasses to read with? Aren’t you supposed to be able to read with varifocals?
Is there any logic to this or is it just Specsavers making a profit from unwary customers!!!!!

BUYER BEWARE Go to any other reputable opticians.

12 12 2009

Had a problem with the same shop a few months ago.
No more Specsavers for me

12 12 2009

Had a problem with the same shop a few months ago.
No more Specsavers for me

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: